#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 mac os x#
#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 software#
#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 mac#
#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 windows#

I subsequently returned this RAM and acquired 4 8GB DIMMs. I then purchased 2 16GB chips in hopes to raise the amount of RAM, however my system would simply not start up at all. I initially had an arrangement of 8 4GB DIMMs.

#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 windows#

Only when running a 64-bit version of Windows XP or later or Linux. More recently, OWC yet againДiscovered these dual processor models can support up to 128 GB, but

#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 mac#

'Leopard' and later increased this maximum to 96 GB of RAM running Mac

#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 mac os x#

OWC firstД¬onfirmed an actual maximum of 64 GB of RAM running Mac OS X 10.5 RAM, but again, OWC found they actually can support more. Systems with dual processors, which notes as the 'EightД¬ore' and 'Twelve Core' models, likewise officially support 32 GB of

From what I have read as per 's information about this unit it should be possible to have far beyond the normal maximum noted by Apple: It all depends upon what apps you run and how long you run between reboots, but donвЂ™t let anyone tell you thatВ running вЂњproвЂќ apps is the only way to chew up RAM.I have a MacPro5,1 with 8 cores (2 quad-core processors) running OS X 10.10.2. Your mileage will almost certainlyВ vary, of course. But my practical experience with the memory management in macOS isnвЂ™t nearly as rosyВ as the white papers would have me believe it shouldВ be, and adding another 16GB of RAM made a huge difference for my daily computing life. I grok why, from a technical standpoint as it relates to battery life and size, Apple limited its MacBook Pro to 16GB today. I think 16GB or even 8GB is enough for me, but I donвЂ™t use my laptop as my daily-driver.В Many people will choose a laptop as their main Mac, though, and AppleвЂ™s recent presentation even painted that as a pretty clear picture of the future for Final Cut Pro X professionals. At least with an SSD a reboot isnвЂ™t the time hog it used to be.ДЇor a laptop, though, I personally wouldnвЂ™t needВ 32GB. Yes, it would be nice if macOS Sierra wasВ able to recover RAM better without a reboot, but itВ doesnвЂ™t. Really what 32GB means is that I have to reboot less than I did when I had only 16GB. There, too, it made a difference, especially given that I often have a second user account logged in simultaneously. The difference was so noticeable that I did the same on my 2011 27вЂі iMac I use in the studio where I record all my podcasts. The point is that for mostly-average usage, I definitely experienced a tangible benefit when upgrading to 32GB of RAM. After 9 days of uptime, including a mostly-unused weekend, macOS Sierra shows over 6GB of swap in-use 32GB Makes a Difference for the Average Dave But I only tend to reboot my Mac once per week and, as my screenshot today shows, IвЂ™m overdue. If I were to reboot my Mac every morning I have no doubt I could live with 16GB or even 8GB without experiencing most of the aforementioned symptoms. My RAM issues happen over time, usually days. Jonathan ZdziarskiвЂ™sВ tests indicated that he launched lots and lots of apps without a RAM issue. That helps keep RAM hogs from eating too much of my system day-after-day. That could be becauseВ I also run Marco ArmentвЂ™s Quitter for MacВ to quit some of my apps when theyвЂ™re not being usedВ (at least overnight), and Slack is one of them. I donвЂ™t often run Chrome, butВ I have eight Slack teams going all day long and donвЂ™t experience any significant RAM issues that I would necessarily attribute to Slack. In his recent piece about the вЂњmythвЂќ of 32GB, Jonathan ZdziarskiВ noted that, for him, Slack and Chrome were massive memory hogs.

#32 gb memory for mac pro mid 2010 software#

The blame here lies with software vendors вЂ“ all of them.

apple.MediaLibraryService chewing up gobs and gobs of RAM for who-knows-what reason. Just as often, though, as you can see in the screenshot from this morning, itвЂ™s some system service like com.

I leave lots of tabs and windows open in the former, and many of them are heavy JavaScript вЂњappsвЂќ like Google Docs and the like. ThatвЂ™s not incorrect in many cases but, for me,В Safari and Mail are often the two apps that start eating gigabytes of RAM at once. ItвЂ™s About The Software, AppleвЂ™s IncludedДЄ lot of people point to crappy third-party software as the RAM hogs.